Scaled Agile Framework(SAFe) and Scrum Framework are the competent software product development methodologies that help in promptly executing every stage of the software development life cycle.
A Brief on SAFe:
SAFe is the abbreviation for “Scalable Agile Framework.” This describes a specific strategy for scaling and balancing Scrum to perform for larger enterprises that have much greater teams operating on the same product. Attend SAFe Agile Certification to get in depth understanding on SAFe.
Brief on Scrum:
Scrum is absolutely an iterative approach of software product development that mainly concentrates on a regular rhythm of performance and delivery. Scrum solely confide on the cross-functional teams, a complete set of protocols and just a few specific supporting roles to assist in driving these deliveries. Attend CSM Certification to know more about Scrum Framework.
On the whole, to the gist, we can conclusively believe that Agile is a way of operating a project, an attitude. Scrum is a core framework and skeleton, which affirms that it is completely based on Agile values and principles.
SAFe is a curative scaling framework that helps in achieving Scrum at the large enterprise level. Let us now jot down the distinct differences between SAFe and Scrum methodologies.
SAFe
Scrum
Manages hefty multi-geography teams
Manages limited accumulated teams
SAFe is excuted in the Agile enterprise as an Extension of Scrum
Scrum is executed in the Agile team
It regulates the Program & Portfolio management
Middle management do not involve here
The essential construct is the Agile Release Train (ART)
Basically, SAFe spreads the impression of agile exceeding the front lines of software development to software managers who must be pronouncing the querries at higher level business strategies.
Panoramic view of SDLC
Particularly, since SAFe was intended to secure a great scenario of software development, it can efficiently handle a coordinated strategy for large-scale and complex projects with hefty teams that count to the hundreds.
Highly efficient in software delivery.
SAFe is massively efficient as it lays its foundation in agile and lean principles, it always tend to perform more efficiently than traditional procedures to software delivery.
Centralization makes multi-team coordination
SAFe is specifically designed to cater the industry needs of the larger organizations that demand to work across different teams, as its centralization paves way to multi-team coordination. In this scenario, it allows for regulated processes across various teams and helps avoid hurdles and delays that may arise when different teams need to work together.
SAFe maintains alignment with business goals
Another striking benefit of SAFe is its strength to help teams maintain alignment with business goals. This is a crucial measure where alignment can usually get lost in agile environments that necessitate more bottom-up strategies, as developers and testers can sometimes get lost over the panoramic view of the business objectives.
By diversity, SA-Fe’s top-down alignment and centralised decision-making do help in strategic objectives prevail on the top of mind and that all decisions get executed in support of those objectives.
Cons of SAFe Methodology
Although SAFe brings numerous benefits to the table, it also reaches with its own drawbacks. Let’s look into that,
Additional layers of oversight as that of the waterfall model
SAFe presents additional layers of oversight, administration and coordination. These specific layers make SAFe more popular with larger enterprises, but sarcastically they make it similar to the waterfall method that many teams are avoiding that.
No freedom for Developers
The methodologies like Scrum give more freedom and opportunities to developers in identifying and solving problems that pop up due to different sprint measures, dependencies, etc., SAFe invoke only for administrative roles to supervise multiple projects and make coordinate those releases and dependencies.
Pros of Scrum Methodology
1. Scrum provides a system of transparency.
Daily scrums accelerate the workers by making them accountable to their assignments. It is also a quality way for a company to sustain their transparency with their clients.
2. Scrum offers impulse on multiple levels.
Teams are continuously urged to meet deadlines and expectations. Individuals are encouraged by the recompenses that are offered for a meeting or exceeding expectations. This kind of system produces a stronger set of skilled work that can be delivered to the client.
3. Scrum provides continuous feedback.
As this methodology mandates daily check-ins for progress reports, there is always feedback submitted at the team and individual level. This does help in making the project better in the long period.
Cons of Scrum Methodology
1. Scrum does not keep an eye on the final project deadline.
The scrum methodology practices individual deadlines to procure a certain amount of work. It does not take into account of the project’s deadline. The one and only real stipulation is that each element in the team meets the proposed expectations.
2. Scrum demands a Team Setting.
Individuals can even inculcate the concepts of Scrum methodology, but this format is designed to operate with a team of at least 3 persons. Also, it cannot operate on larger teams, it’s only suitable for small teams. If there are more than 10 people involved, Scrum will not work well.
3. Scrum expects Experience.
Feedback can be projected to teams and individuals through appropriate and consistent experience only. If the concerned individual or team that proposed feedback has not experienced in the work being done already, then the entire system would break down.
Thus weighing the pros and cons of the SAFe and Scrum methodologies SAFe seems to outweigh the more benefits in accomplishing quality software product in relatively less time. Hence SAFe framework is considered to be more successful than the Scrum framework in larger enterprises.
